Cancer ScreeningIntroductionCancer is a common disease: the life-time risk of being diagnosed with cancer is 1:2 if you were born after 1960.1 Cancer survival rates are, however, much improved,1 thanks to better treatments, research which has led to new understanding of the disease, enhanced diagnostic equipment, screening and early detection. Screening programmes detect changes in cells at a pre-cancerous stage, enabling preventative treatment and regular, more frequent monitoring of high risk patients to commence. Understanding cancer and how it develops will increase your confidence in answering questions from patients about cancer, and will help you understand the principles of the NHS screening programme. The focus of this resource is the NHS cancer screening programme and uses four assessment questions to test and develop your knowledge of cancer screening and prevention. The resource, offered at intermediate level, and its associated activities will take approximately one hour to complete. Aims and ObjectivesOn completion of this resource you will have a better understanding of:
Reading liste-learning for health: cancer in the community https://www.e-lfh.org.uk/programmes/cancer-in-the-community/ Public Health England – Search for cancer screening https://www.gov.uk/search?q=cancer+screening&show_organisations_filter=true&filter_organisations%5B%5D=public-health-england NHS choices https://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/Screening/Pages/screening.aspx Practice Nurse featured articlesCancer in the community, Part 1: Cancer screening, Catherine Wilson, Head of The Royal Marsden School, London. Practice Nurse 2016;46(09): 33-35 National cancer screening programmes: risks, benefits and concerns Hannah Waterhouse, Practice Nurse July 2013; 43(07):44-48 Focus on women’s health: Best practice in cervical screening Jenny Greenfield, Practice Nurse May 2015;45(05):16-20 Evidence and controversies. Katherine Hunt, Practice Nurse November 2013;43(11)44-47 Prostate cancer and the practice nurse. Jim Pollard, Practice Nurse November 2014;44(11):41-45 |
|