Use of SGLT2 inhibitors to treat type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of lower limb amputation and diabetic ketoacidosis compared with GLP1 receptor agonists, according to a study in The BMJ .
Although the absolute risk increase is small, the findings expand on current knowledge and quantify the risk of serious adverse events potentially linked to this group of drugs, say the researchers.
SGLT2 inhibitors are increasingly popular drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. They lower blood glucose levels by increasing glucose loss through the kidneys, but concerns have been raised regarding their safety.
Some studies have suggested that their use may be associated with serious complications, including lower limb amputation, bone fracture, diabetic ketoacidosis, acute kidney injury, serious urinary tract infections, blood clots (venous thromboembolism) and acute pancreatitis.
To better understand these potential risks, an international research team analysed national registry data from Sweden and Denmark for 17,213 patients who started taking SGLT2 inhibitors and 17,213 patients who started taking GLP1 receptor agonists between July 2003 and December 2016.
Patients were aged 35 years or more with no previous prescriptions for any of the study drugs, no history of severe kidney problems (dialysis or transplantation) or pancreatic disorders, and median follow-up time for the studied outcomes was between 270 and 274 days.
The main outcomes were lower limb amputation, bone fracture, diabetic ketoacidosis, acute kidney injury, serious urinary tract infection, venous thromboembolism and acute pancreatitis.
After taking account of a large number of potentially influential factors including disease history, other medications and socioeconomic indicators, use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a two-fold increased risk of both lower limb amputation (2.7 vs 1.1 events per 1000 person years) and diabetic ketoacidosis (1.3 vs 0.6 events per 1000 person years), compared with GLP1 receptor agonists.
But there was no significant risk increase for bone fracture, acute kidney injury, serious urinary tract infection, venous thromboembolism or acute pancreatitis.
Findings remained consistent after further analyses to test the strength of the results.
This is an observational study, so no firm conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect, and the researchers cannot rule out the possibility that other unmeasured factors may have affected the results.
Ueda P, et al. BMJ 2018;363:k4365